SoulPancake

Are rules meant to be broken?

Saturday, October 24, 2009 - FEATURES

[SP EXCLUSIVE]

Jackson’s first lesson ended with a few three-shot rallies and a homework suggestion: “Observe some of your rules and break one. One, just for fun.”

“Break rules?” he asked suspiciously, as he tapped his last shot barely over the net. “Can you give me an example?”

“Like: ‘I have to do this’ or ‘I should do that.’ Those kinds of rules,” I explained. “Murder would go beyond our scope.” I thought that was funny, but his consternation remained fixed.

We had our next meeting three weeks later after his family vacation to the South Carolina coast. “Did you break any rules?” I asked the wiry 36-year-old, while we rallied to warm up.

“No,” he admitted. “It was honestly too hard. Rules are just too habitual.”

“That’s how they become rules,” I laughed.

“They are so ingrained,” he repeated, his play stiff with premeditation. His over-6-foot body seemed stuck.

“Let’s break a sweat,” I proposed. As we upped the intensity, his play remained deliberate, his legs moved sandpiper-like—short, quick, tight steps and abrupt stops. His arms, similar to a turtle’s, poked out to hit the ball and then retracted. After the five-minute, silent exchange in the end-of-summer heat, I asked, “How was your trip?”

He swiftly gulped water and said, “Full of weather.”

I thought the response odd and tried a different tact. “What was your favorite moment?”

“Well, maybe not my favorite, but it was the most alarming, the most memorable,” he began, dabbing sweat beads off his forehead. “While watching all the cousins playing on the beach, my mother said, ‘Somehow, I love those terrible kids.’” There was a pang in the emotiveness of his response.

“Would she say that about you?”

Jackson just laughed nervously. “Let’s hit some more tennis balls,” he said. But after another five minutes, he was again worn out and thirsty.

At the net, I asked my question in a new way: “Were her kids terrible?” He gave me a very rigid nod.

“I got it,” I said. “Let’s rally some more, and I’d like you to hit incorrectly.”
“Incorrectly?”
“Yes, hit wrong. Hit against all the lessons you’ve taken.”

The first “incorrect” shot came off his racket like a cannonball—hard and heavy, low over the net, and into the court. His knees flexed and his racket, still in his hand, flew around his body. To Jackson, incorrect seemed to mean “unleashed.”

“WOW!” Jackson’s eyes popped. “I’ve never felt that before.” He was transformed: He looked his full height, his shoulders settled below his ears, his smile not forced, and his swing did not retract before he finished. He looked involved, rather than panicked. His stamina increased.

“You want to know something that happened on the trip?” he offered.
“Tell me as I volley,” I said, and I moved play toward the net.
“I didn’t stop my kids from building their Legos wrong,” he said, hitting more shots steadily in a row.

My eyes squinted with curiosity. “You broke a rule!?”
“Well,” he diminished, “it’s not that I broke a rule; it’s just that I didn’t implement one.” He hit into my chest, and I volleyed it back into his wheel house—the perfect spot for his swing.

“How did the kids respond?”
“They had a lot more fun.”
“And you?” I hit another ball into his silence.

“Did the children make mistakes?”
“Lots of mistakes.”
“Oh my god,” I taunted. “They built Legos wrong?”

“OK, I get it, I get it,” he said. “I get it … let’s hit balls.” And he went to the baseline mumbling, “I broke a rule. I broke a rule.” But his initial wave of anxiety quickly morphed into a nimbleness and spring. Suddenly, Jackson was having fun, no matter where the balls went—right, left, or wrong.

We finished the meeting, packed our gear, and walked to the parking lot in a satisfied silence. As we stepped through the gate into life outside the court, I looked back and asked, “What happened in there?”

“I guess my rule to be right temporarily disappeared, and I surprisingly became a better player,” he said. “And I guess it was the same way at the beach. But there, I became a better father, and I guess I that helped to make my children better, too.”

If you could immediately do something 'wrong,' which personal rule would you break?

:: exploring the right of wrong by sports/life coach Zach Kleiman

hello

If i could do something 'wrong', it would be the rule of having to listen to what my parents say. Honestly, they have no clue what I want or who I am personally, but I feel like I cannot tell them simply because it ends up with them yelling at me and stuff like that. I end up just not talking to them at all most days because it is too difficult and not worth the effort..

REPLY
treebythesea


i started breaking traffic rules on my motorcycle a little while ago. it was after my fiance left me. i guess when she left, it just made me stop caring about anything. i started doing stunts in traffic and on the freeway and i was speeding everywhere. i wrecked my bike at 105 mph because i had a mindset of f##k the rules.i got lucky because my only injuries are torn muscles, a hyperextended knee and three nasty cuts on my leg. i could have been kicked out of a program i just joined, and i definitely owe a lot of money for medical bills, but if i could do it all over again, i wouldnt change a thing. you might think im crazy or stupid but im glad to have had that experience especially because i got so lucky(in terms of physical health). either way, i still say f##k the rules i do what i want. however, i have the utmost respect for the organization i just joined, so i fallow their rules. and they are very rule oriented.

REPLY
XxSharonbabyXx

Yes,rules are meant to be broken. but some are there for good reason. But if you dont break rules you'll live your life in a box so to speak. i think the law i would imediately break would be that curfew law for minors to be home by 10. The law is there to protect us kiddies and teens but c'mon we live once let us live a little!!

REPLY
Selenite

@charis I totally agree! To me rules seem like ways of trying to make evwerything perfect, not saying that we don't need them because we do , but we also need to break them sometimes.

REPLY
charis

If we don't ever break any rules, change will never happen, creativity would be restrained.

REPLY
resahc

@Kimber9489 sorry i mistyped not put ourselves in those norms but take ourselves out!

REPLY
esalaslimon

@resahc as far as America needing to change, i agree. but we r not a democracy. we r a republic (look it up, im not kidding). red and blue are teams politicians sell to us to try to get us to root for them. no two politicians totally agree on every little thing. that's why its better for the common idiot to be able to agree with one of two sides. like a football game. if we took every NFL team and grouped them all together into two teams (one half being from one coast, the other from the other coast, up to the middle of the US) then my analogy would be complete!

REPLY
esalaslimon

@Creativewriting13 its called behaving in opposite to the Law of Human Nature. Man, naturally, wants to be beneficial only to himself. disobeying this "rule" is what separates us from animals. it also gives evidence to the existence of a conscience.

REPLY
resahc

@Kimber9489 I agree that we can make a difference. Civil disobedience is what that has brought our nation to where it is today. We need to break rules to change the way things are. We are a democracy but are we given power? I don't think that this red and blue system really works. I disagree that we have to look at ourselves more or less like others do. When we do that we reinforce norms and we need to break those and put ourselves within those norms. We need to make life happen but we must remember where this life came from (not in the sense of creation) but how we got to this thing we call the U.S. It was through exploitation and oppression

REPLY
esalaslimon

@annxdisaster hey if spellcheck told me "pre-existence" was not a word i must obey!

REPLY